Comments on: Natural Brain Entrainment vs. Artificial Brainwave Induction

By: Shannon

Shannon — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:34:19 +0000

As a follow-up to my previous comment, I want to be clear about one thing. I have noticed that most people in general, are looking for a quick fix in todays world. The organizations that SELL based on the Quick Fix stand to make a killing in the market place.

Many people considering the difference between a technological ‘quick fix’ and a natural technique that may take more time, are not always looking for a QUALITY outcome. They may be more interest in fast results.

There is virtue in ‘working’ a bit for the results. There certainly would be a higher sense of Personal Achievement.

I support the natural way when it comes to doing things with your brain.

When you ‘force feed’ the brain in an artificial way, you may find it is counter-productive in the long run.

By: Shannon

Shannon — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:30:11 +0000

To sum it up ‘Experience’. I often have the experience to gain knowledge and experience from my clients without actually putting myself at risk to do so. In this particular case, I can share his experience with others as well.

I do recognize that there are many different methods and devices to achieve a different state of consciousness in different ways.

The moral of the story is not prohibition, it is – gain all the best information you can before making the decision to go down that particular road.

Because your brain is precious, is it worth the risk (and maybe even damage) to blunder blindly forward?

By: Paul

Paul — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:40:34 +0000

I would like to know if you have any reference or source for the assertion that information must come out the way it goes in. From experience I have observed that an environment close to the one studied in is conducive to testing but I can recall learned data at any time, at any place.